Post Content
A Maine church is asking the Supreme Court to block restrictions against houses of worship during the coronavirus pandemic, claiming that limiting its ability to hold religious services while exempting other activities and businesses for being “essential” violates its rights under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.
In a petition filed Wednesday, the Calvary Chapel of Bangor referenced other cases in which the Supreme Court has sided with religious organizations who pushed back against similar restrictions.
SUPREME COURT TO HEAR CASE ON MAINE TUITION PROGRAM THAT BARS MONEY FOR RELIGIOUS EDUCATION
“Despite the abundant precedent from this Court, Maine ignored it all and continued to impose discriminatory and unconstitutional restrictions on religious worship services long after it became clear they were unconstitutional,” the church said in its petition. “In fact, even after all of the various restrictions had been enjoined or rescinded, Maine maintained the dubious distinction of imposing the most severe restrictions in the nation on places of worship.”
Earlier in the pandemic, the church recalled, Gov. Janet Mills prohibited all gatherings for religious services at houses of worship before eventually allowing them – first capped at 10 people, then 50, then five people for every 1,000 square feet, which was still 50 for the Calvary Chapel. While the toughest restrictions are no longer in place, the church is worried that that they could be reinstated due to concerns over the COVID-19 delta variant.
SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST CUOMO’S CORONAVIRUS LIMITS – WITH BARRETT PLAYING KEY ROLE
“Thus, the continuing threat posed to Calvary Chapel’s cherished constitutional liberties remains omnipresent and seemingly unending,” the church claimed. “The fact that the Governor is already raising the alarm over the new variants and her continued power to reinstate her prior restrictions at any time demonstrates the continuing need for injunctive relief from this Court.”
Mills’ office did not immediately reply to Fox News’ request for comment.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
At one point, the church stated, there were 44 categories of businesses exempt from the state restrictions, including marijuana dispensaries. Highlighting the alleged unfairness, the church noted that there is no cap on the number of people who are allowed to participate in charitable activities in the church’s building, yet religious services are restricted.
The church pointed to other cases in which the Supreme Court blocked restrictions in states such as California and New York, where religious services were limited while other activities were exempt. It is asking the Supreme Court to, at the very least, vacate lower court decisions against it and send the case back down to be reconsidered in light of the other states’ cases.