Post Content
White House press secretary Jen Psaki dismissed concerns that President Biden is “signaling that he doesn’t respect the rule of law” following the new moratorium on evictions.
“I’m not sure there are Americans evaluating it to that degree, maybe there are some you’ve talked to,” Psaki told a reporter Wednesday during a press conference, when asked about Americans’ concerns about the new moratorium. “He’s gonna do everything in his power to make sure they can stay in their homes as long as possible.”
The Biden administration announced a new targeted moratorium on evictions on Tuesday, after previously saying it had no legal standing on the matter following a June Supreme Court ruling. The announcement has sparked concerns and questions about the legality of the move, including from constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley.
JOHN KENNEDY ON EVICTIONS MORATORIUM: FOR MANY IN WASHINGTON, THE ‘CONSTITUTION IS JUST A NUISANCE’
“Biden admitted that ‘the bulk’ of the constitutional experts consulted said that extending the moratorium would be unconstitutional. Yet, he indicated that he would still like to pursue it due to a couple of scholars encouraging him,” Fox News contributor Turley tweeted about the announcement Tuesday evening. “What was astonishing is that Biden acknowledged that it is still likely unconstitutional but that they could tie it up in courts to get the money out in the interim.”
Psaki fielded other questions on the legality of the moratorium during the press conference, prompting her to explain, “It’s not an extension,” but a “different moratorium from a policy and legal standpoint.”
“He’s issuing or overseeing this order from the CDC, in the face of doubts about its constitutionality. There are many people out there who say that the president is essentially not giving voice to the ethic that he campaigned on,” one reporter told Psaki. “How do you square all that?”
“You know I’m gonna ask you who’s saying that,” Psaki responded.
The reporter said that “there are plenty of people” voicing concern and that they are not only Republicans.
“Okay, I’ll leave that to others to figure out,” she said.
“I think what’s important to note here is that the president would not have moved forward with a step where he didn’t feel comfortable and confident in the legal justification,” she continued. “But he asked the CDC and his legal experts to look at what is possible. This is a narrow, targeted moratorium that is different from the national moratorium. It’s not an extension of that,” she added.
The comments come after the Supreme Court ruled 4-5 in June to allow the CDC to continue its moratorium until July 31, and said that any future extensions would be in Congress’s hands.
The White House had previously said it lacked the legal authority to extend the federal moratorium on evictions in light of the Supreme Court ruling and put the onus of any extension on Congress.
WATERS URGES CDC TO IGNORE SUPREME COURT RULING, EXTEND EVICTION BAN
“In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the President calls on Congress to extend the eviction moratorium to protect such vulnerable renters and their families without delay,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said last week.
Again on Monday, Psaki said that the CDC had “been unable to find legal authority for a new, targeted eviction moratorium.”
“Our team is redoubling efforts to identify all available legal authorities to provide necessary protections. In the meantime, the President will continue to do everything in his power to help renters from eviction.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
But on Tuesday, the administration announced a new targeted eviction ban to replace the one that expired on Saturday. The president said he spoke with constitutional scholars and even conceded that “the bulk of the constitutional scholars say it’s not likely to pass constitutional muster.”
The new CDC ban focuses on “counties experiencing substantial and high levels of community transmission levels” and will last until Oct. 3.