6.17am EDT
06:17
No 10 says cabinet agreed to Johnson’s plans for social care
5.42am EDT
05:42
Government denies planning for ‘firebreak’ lockdown in October
5.13am EDT
05:13
Zahawi says he has not seen any plans for possible October ‘firebreak’ lockdown
4.56am EDT
04:56
Nadhim Zahawi ‘not comfortable’ with breaking manifesto promises
4.48am EDT
04:48
Johnson cites NHS Covid crisis as reason for national insurance rising in breach of manifesto pledge
6.26am EDT
06:26
We are getting three Commons statements today, starting at 12.30pm; from Boris Johnson, then Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the Commons, then Therese Coffey, the work and pensions secretary.
Johnson’s will cover social care. We do not know yet what Rees-Mogg will say, but there has been speculation that Downing Street will schedule a vote on social care this week, and that is the sort of thing Rees-Mogg would need to announce to MPs in a statement. The Telegraph’s Ben Riley-Smith posted this on Twitter last night.
(@benrileysmith)
SNAP VOTE ALERT. Understand No 10 has been considering holding a speedy vote this week on social care / NI rise to bounce rebels into backing it. TBC but one to watch.
We expect Coffey will use her statement to confirm that the pension triple lock is being abandoned this year.
6.17am EDT
06:17
No 10 says cabinet agreed to Johnson’s plans for social care
Downing Street says minister backed Boris Johnson’s plans for social care at this morning’s cabinet. At the lobby briefing the prime minister’s spokesman told journalists”
The cabinet agreed to the proposals set out. There was strong agreement that this is a long-standing issue, particularly on the social care side, which had been ducked for too long and which needed to be addressed.
Given that very few key decisions actually get taken in cabinet these days (it rubber stamps decisions thrashed out by smaller groups elsewhere), it is not surprising that Johnson got them to sign off on what he is going to announce.
But this statement does suggest there was some dissent. Agreeing that social care is “a long-standing issue … which had been ducked for too long and which [needs] to be addressed” is not the same as saying that Johnson’s plan for addressing it is the right one.
6.09am EDT
06:09
Two former Conservative party leaders have expressed strong reservations about Boris Johnson’s plans for social care. The Telegraph quotes Iain Duncan Smith saying the plans are a “sham” because they are not linked to proposals to fundamentally reform the way social care is delivered.
And William Hague has used his column in the Times (paywall) to say that breaking a manifesto promise is extremely risky. He says:
The political downsides of being seen to go back on such a promise are very great: loss of credibility when making future election commitments, a blurring of the distinction between Tory and Labour philosophies, a recruiting cry for fringe parties on the right, and an impression given to the world that the UK is heading for higher taxes still. That adds up to an extremely high price, and if I was still around in the cabinet I would be on the very reluctant end of the argument about funding social care through a tax rise seen as breaking an election promise …
Pragmatic Tories understand that the challenges of demography, levelling up and climate change mean a more active state. But that should not mean an ever-more expensive one. The government has between now and the next election to show that it is defined by leading the country into becoming an innovative, highly educated economy that can pay for good public health without continuing tax rises. If it can’t do that, it will be defined instead by the events of this week.
But Hague does not seem 100% sure that this policy will turn out to be a mistake. He qualifies his assessment by saying that Johnson is “an election-winning marvel with an extraordinary instinct for what he can get away with”.
5.53am EDT
05:53
According to government briefing, the GBP10bn or more raised by the proposed national insurance increase will be at first be spend mostly on supporting the NHS, before later being used to make social care more generous. We don’t have details, and this has not been confirmed on the record, but this is what the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg reported last night.
I’m told the cash raised, potentially over GBP12bn, will be ring-fenced somehow, targeted initially at the health service itself then will switch to social care after three years.
But is this plausible? Three other political editors have their doubts.
From the FT’s George Parker
(@GeorgeWParker)
Let’s say the capacity of the NHS is increased by 10 per cent to deal with the Covid backlog. Does anyone really think that capacity will be CUT by 10 per cent at some point in the future? Or will the Treasury be looking for cash to fund social care reform in a few years’ time?
From the Sun’s Harry Cole
(@MrHarryCole)
Frankly the numbers don’t add up yet. This can’t be a long term social care fix if the NHS capacity is also going to be boosted by 110pc by next election. No going back on that politically.. 10billion a year not enough – there’s a blackhole in the blackhole fix, currently.
From the Mirror’s Pippa Crerar
(@PippaCrerar)
Big potential problem: does the NHS end up being the ‘human shield’ for social care funding that never actually makes it to the sector. Does anybody really think the NHS will reach a point it needs *less* money? https://t.co/7H4yDgmD4L
5.42am EDT
05:42
Government denies planning for ‘firebreak’ lockdown in October
The Department for Education has gone further than Nadhim Zahawi, the health minister (see 10.13am), and explicitly denied that the government is planning a “firebreak” lockdown around the time of the autumn half term. A report for the i claims the government is making contingency plans for a lockdown of this kind if hospitalisations continue at their current rate.
(@educationgovuk)
It is not true that the Government is planning a lockdown or firebreak around the October half term. https://t.co/MAByqutmeo
Updated
at 6.31am EDT
5.34am EDT
05:34
Last night the Department of Health and Social Care announced an extra GBP5.4bn for the NHS in England over the next six months – and around GBP6bn for the NHS across the whole of the UK over that period.
In a joint statement, NHS Confederation and NHS Providers, which both represent hospitals and other NHS organisations, have welcomed the news, but said an extra GBP10bn a year over the next three years will still be needed. They said:
The NHS has been desperately seeking clarity on its budget for the second half of the year and the government has now delivered that certainty with this GBP5.4 billion announcement. The NHS can now get on with the huge task it has ahead of what we anticipate will be one of the most challenging winters the service has ever faced. The task for the government now is to follow up in its spending review with the extra GBP10 billion a year the NHS will need over the next three years to avoid patient services from being cut.
In an interview with Times Radio, Saffron Cordery, deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, also said that, although social care reform was necessary, she was concerned that all the comment so far has been about funding, not about how care is delivered. She explained:
One of my fears about the announcements that are being made at the moment is that we’re talking about how that’s going to be funded but what we haven’t seen at all is the plans for what that reform of social care will look like.
We absolutely know that social care needs more money, but we’ve got to make sure that we’re putting that money in the right place, just as we do in the NHS. So whilst the focus is always on the money, let’s think about how that’s going to be used.
5.21am EDT
05:21
John Swinney, Scotland’s deputy first minister, has said he is self-isolating after coming into contact with someone with Covid. He posted this on Twitter last night.
(@JohnSwinney)
I have been advised tonight that I am a close contact of an individual who has tested positive for Covid. I have booked a PCR test and will be self-isolating in line with the rules. Thanks to all the contact tracers for their diligent work.
5.13am EDT
05:13
Zahawi says he has not seen any plans for possible October ‘firebreak’ lockdown
In an interview with BBC Breakfast this morning Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccine deployment minister, was asked about a report in the i saying the government had drawn up plans for an October “firebreak” lockdown if Covid hospitalisations continue to rise. “I haven’t seen any plans around this,” Zahawi said.
Updated
at 5.18am EDT
4.56am EDT
04:56
Nadhim Zahawi ‘not comfortable’ with breaking manifesto promises
As my colleague Jamie Grierson reports, in his interviews this morning Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccine deployment minister, also said that he was “not comfortable with breaking any manifesto promises”.
4.48am EDT
04:48
Johnson cites NHS Covid crisis as reason for national insurance rising in breach of manifesto pledge
Good morning. Boris Johnson will today unveil his long-promised plans to reform social care, first to MPs in a statement to the Commons and then to the public directly at a press conference. It is a huge political challenge, for two obvious reasons.
First, social care is a problem that politicians of all parties have shelved for more than a decade – for the straightforward reason that improving the system will cost huge sums of money, and it is hard to persuade the public to back higher taxes.
This would be a challenge for any prime minister, but Johnson faces an added problem that he fought an election promising not to put up income tax, national insurance or VAT, despite being warned that the social care reform he promised would be impossible without at least one of these taxes going up. Now he is set to break that promise.
Of course, Johnson has plenty of experience of not honouring the pledges he has made to people but until now this behaviour has not harmed his ascent to the top of British politics. But at the weekend Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the Commons, reminded Johnson that George Bush lost the US presidency after breaking a promise not to put up taxes, and so potentially what Johnson is doing today is perilous.
But it doesn’t have to be. If Johnson can persuade the public that his move is justified, this does not have to be another “read my lips” debacle. And overnight we saw the first glimpse of the argument that Johnson will use to justify his flagrant manifesto-busting: Johnson is using the NHS Covid emergency to justify national insurance going up now.
The government is arguing that the GBP10bn or so raised by the national insurance rise will initially be used primarily to rescue the NHS from the crisis caused by Covid, before it primarily starts funding better social care (after the next election, when the 2019 manifesto promise is no longer operable). In a No 10 press statement issued overnight about today’s announcement, eight of the 10 paragraphs were about the NHS, not social care. And Johnson was quoted as saying:
The NHS is the pride of our United Kingdom, but it has been put under enormous strain by the pandemic. We cannot expect it to recover alone.
We must act now to ensure the health and care system has the long-term funding it needs to continue fighting Covid and start tackling the backlogs, and end the injustice of catastrophic costs for social care.
My government will not duck the tough decisions needed to get NHS patients the treatment they need and to fix our broken social care system.
And this morning Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccine deployment minister, used a similar line in interviews. Asked on the Today programme if Johnson was wrong when he told voters in 2019 that he would be able to reform social care without raising taxes, Zahawi replied: “Well, first of all, there was no pandemic [in 2019], if you recall. This is an unprecedented time for the whole world, and for the United Kingdom.”
Will this work? Who knows, but the NHS is one cause that can definitely persuade British voters to support higher taxes, as Gordon Brown discovered in 2002. When he put up national insurance to raise more money for health, the move was wildly popular (although Brown, unlike Johnson, had spend more than a year trying to shift public opinion on this issue, including by commissioning the banker Derek Wanless to produce a report explaining why the money was needed). It is not inconceivable that Johnson could break two of his main manifesto promises (on national insurance and on the pension triple lock, also expected to be breached today), and yet see his popularity go up.
Here is the agenda for the day.
8.30am: Boris Johnson chairs cabinet, where ministers are learning full details of the plans for social care.
11.30am: Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, takes questions in the Commons.
After 12.30pm: Johnson makes a statement to MPs about his social care plan.
After 2pm: MPs debate the second reading of the elections bill.
2.30pm: Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s first minister, unveils her programme for government in the Scottish parliament.
Late afternoon: Johnson holds a press conference with Sunak and Sajid Javid, the health secretary.
Today I will be mostly focusing on the social care announcement. For Covid coverage, do read our global coronavirus live blog.
I try to monitor the comments below the line (BTL) but it is impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer questions, and if they are of general interest, I will post the question and reply above the line (ATL), although I can’t promise to do this for everyone.
If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.
Alternatively, you can email me at andrew.sparrow@theguardian.com
Updated
at 4.59am EDT