Israeli shot dead is 101st victim of violence in Arab community this year

Read More

A 25-year-old male was shot and killed on early Tuesday morning in the Arab town of Umm al-Fahm, raising the death toll of violence victims in Israel’s Arab community to 101 since the beginning of the year.

The man, Khalil Abu Ja’u Agbariah, sustained critical gunshot wounds and was evacuated to Haemek Hospital in Afula, where he was pronounced dead.

LISTEN: The offshore accounts bankrolling Israeli settlements

The shooting occurred as Abu Ja’u Agbariah, a father of two, was on his way to work. He is the sixth member of his family to be murdered in the past two and a half years.

The police have opened an investigation into the incident and are searching for the shooter.

>>> Israel’s other epidemic: Violence in Arab community threatens entire country

On Monday, a 44-year-old male from the Arab town of Bi’ina, Salim Hasarma, was murdered by gun fire. Hasarma did not have a criminal background, however his family had an ongoing dispute with another family in the town, and the assumption is that this is what led to the shooting.

Hasarma realized that a car was following him while he was driving to work, so he tried to escape and ended up parking by a house in the area. The shooter then shot him from close range and fled the scene. Harma’s brother, Ibrahim, was murdered two years ago, and no suspects have yet to be found.


Violence in Israeli Arab community reaches grim milestone as 100th victim shot dead


Not without a warrant


Israel’s Arabs are unimpressed by politicians’ promises to halt crime

On Sunday, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett warned of the consequences of growing violence in the Israeli Arab community, as the cabinet voted to expand police search powers to fight the violence.

“We are losing the state,” he said at a cabinet meeting about the violence in the Arab community.

The amendment, proposed by Justice Minister Gideon Sa’ar, gives police the right to conduct a warrantless search upon reasonable suspicion that an object connected to a serious crime – including weapons and protection charges – is present. The power would only be granted in cases where the object is needed immediately in order to prevent it from being damaged or disposed of.

Related articles

You may also be interested in

Headline

Never Miss A Story

Get our Weekly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.
Cookie policy

We use our own and third party cookies to allow us to understand how the site is used and to support our marketing campaigns.