4.13pm EDT
16:13
House votes to hold Bannon in contempt for defying Capitol attack subpoena
4.05pm EDT
16:05
House secures votes to hold Bannon in contempt for defying Capitol attack subpoena
3.46pm EDT
15:46
House votes on measure to hold Bannon in criminal contempt
3.08pm EDT
15:08
Cheney endorses Bannon contempt measure: Americans ‘deserve to hear his testimony’
2.44pm EDT
14:44
House passes procedural measure to advance Bannon contempt resolution
1.59pm EDT
13:59
Joe Manchin pumps brakes on imminent spending package framework deal
1.24pm EDT
13:24
‘We have to keep up the fight and get it done,’ Biden says of voting rights legislation
4.13pm EDT
16:13
House votes to hold Bannon in contempt for defying Capitol attack subpoena
It is official: the House has voted to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for defying subpoenas issued by the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
The final vote was 229 to 202, with all Democrats and nine Republicans supporting the resolution.
(@HouseDailyPress)
The House adopted H. Res. 730 – contempt resolution regarding Stephen K. Bannon’s refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by the Select Committee to Investigate the Jan 6th Attack on the US Capitol on a vote of 229-202.
The matter will now be referred to the justice department, which will have to determine whether to prosecute Bannon, a former senior adviser to Donald Trump.
Testifying before the House judiciary committee earlier today, attorney general Merrick Garland said the justice department would fairly review any referral sent by the House.
“The department of justice will do what it always does in such circumstances,” Garland told the committee. “We’ll apply the facts and the law and make a decision, consistent with the principles of prosecution.”
4.05pm EDT
16:05
House secures votes to hold Bannon in contempt for defying Capitol attack subpoena
The House vote remains open, but the resolution to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt has now gained enough support to pass the chamber.
As of now, 221 House members, including eight Republicans, have voted to hold the Trump ally in criminal contempt for defying subpoenas issued by the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
However, the vote remains open, so the result is not yet official. If the House passes the resolution as expected, the matter will then be referred to the justice department, which will have to determine whether to prosecute Bannon.
3.55pm EDT
15:55
The House vote is still open, but as of now, six Republicans have joined Democrats in supporting the resolution to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for defying subpoenas from the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
As a reminder, if the House passes the resolution as expected, the matter will then be referred to the justice department, which will have to determine whether to prosecute Bannon.
3.46pm EDT
15:46
House votes on measure to hold Bannon in criminal contempt
The House is now voting on a measure to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for defying subpoenas issued by the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
(@HouseDailyPress)
The House is voting NOW on H. Res. 730 – contempt resolution regarding Stephen K. Bannon’s refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by the Select Committee to Investigate the Jan 6th Attack on the US Capitol.
The vote comes after the House completed an hour of debate on the contempt measure, with all but two Republicans denouncing the proposal.
Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the select committee, accused his Republican colleagues of avoiding the truth and “performing for an audience of one,” meaning Donald Trump.
The blog will be watching the vote closely, so stay tuned.
3.42pm EDT
15:42
Adam Kinzinger, the other Republican member of the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, joined Liz Cheney in endorsing the resolution to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt.
(@ABCPolitics)
NEW: GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger: “Steve Bannon went out of his way to earn this resolution before us and now we must approve it.” https://t.co/K39NM7r6C5 pic.twitter.com/EPVXRajoFa
“Steve Bannon went out of his way to earn this resolution before us and now we must approve it,” Kinzinger said of the Trump ally’s refusal to comply with the committee’s subpoenas.
“I have no doubt that Mr Bannon’s scorn for our subpoena is real. But no one — and I repeat no one — is above the law, and we need to hear from him.”
It’s worth noting that Kinzinger was introduced by the Democratic chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, and he delivered his remarks from the Democrats‘ side of the House chamber.
3.26pm EDT
15:26
During the House debate on the resolution to hold Steve Bannon in contempt, Liz Cheney entered an interesting document into the official record.
Per CNN, the document submitted by Cheney shows that Republican congressman Jim Banks has been sending letters to government officials, such as interior secretary Deb Haaland, seeking information provided to the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
(@AnnieGrayerCNN)
On the House floor, Liz Cheney entered this into the record calling out Jim Banks for sending letters to government agencies claiming he is the ranking member of the 1/6 committee even though he is not on the committee. pic.twitter.com/C1OxGeVhXN
In the letter, Banks identifies himself as one of the Republican members chosen by minority leader Kevin McCarthy to serve on the select committee and criticizes Nancy Pelosi for blocking his appointment.
However, McCarthy pulled all of his nominees from the committee after Pelosi objected to two of the selections, Banks and Jim Jordan. So Banks is not actually a member of the select committee and yet is still claiming that he has a right to information gathered by the panel.
3.08pm EDT
15:08
Cheney endorses Bannon contempt measure: Americans ‘deserve to hear his testimony’
Congresswoman Liz Cheney, one of just two Republicans serving on the House select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, encouraged her colleagues to support the resolution to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for defying the panel’s subpoenas.
In her House floor speech during the debate on the resolution, Cheney argued that Bannon’s comments on his podcast the day before and the day of the insurrection were “shocking and indefensible”.
“He said all hell is going to break loose. He said, ‘We are coming in right over the target. This is the point of attack we have always wanted,'” Cheney said.
(@MSNBC)
“He said all hell is going to break loose. He said, ‘We are coming in right over the target,'” Rep. Cheney recalls what Steve Bannon said before Jan. 6.
“There is no doubt that Mr. Bannon knows far more … There is no doubt that all hell did break loose.” pic.twitter.com/KV94QMnFHY
The Wyoming congresswoman lamented that many of her fellow House Republicans, who have staunchly opposed the committee’s investigation and the contempt measure, “now seem to have forgotten the danger of the moment, the assault on the Constitution, the assault on our Congress”.
“In fact, there is no doubt that Mr Bannon knows far more than what he said on the video. There is no doubt that all hell did broke loose. Just ask the scores of brave police officers who were injured that day protecting all of us,” Cheney said.
She concluded, “The American people deserve to hear his testimony.”
Updated
at 3.30pm EDT
2.55pm EDT
14:55
If the Democratic-controlled House passes the contempt resolution as expected, the matter will then be referred to the justice department, which will have to decide whether to prosecute Steve Bannon for defying congressional subpoenas.
Speaking before the House judiciary committee today, attorney general Merrick Garland said his department would fairly review any referral sent by the chamber.
“The department of justice will do what it always does in such circumstances,” Garland said. “We’ll apply the facts and the law and make a decision, consistent with the principles of prosecution.”
(@cspan)
Attorney General Merrick Garland says @TheJusticeDept will follow the law on Steve Bannon contempt resolution and the House’s referral. pic.twitter.com/42JlePxEwJ
2.44pm EDT
14:44
House passes procedural measure to advance Bannon contempt resolution
The House has cleared a key procedural hurdle in approving a contempt resolution for Steven Bannon, after the former Trump adviser defied subpoenas from the select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.
The House approved the rule to consider the contempt resolution in a vote of 221 to 205, which fell mostly along party lines.
(@HouseDailyPress)
The House adopted H.Res. 727 by a vote of 221-205. https://t.co/OGpqIZgfqa
The House is now beginning up to one hour of debate on the measure, after which the full chamber will vote on whether Bannon should be held in criminal contempt for defying the committee’s subpoenas.
The blog will be watching the debate closely, so stay tuned.
Updated
at 2.45pm EDT
2.27pm EDT
14:27
Joanna Walters
The state leadership in Texas has asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place its law banning almost all abortion in the state.
The Associated Press reports that the official message from Texas also told the justices there’s no reason to rush into the case.
The state filed its response Thursday to the Biden administration’s call on the court to block the law, the most restrictive abortion curb in the nation, and rule conclusively this term on the measure’s constitutionality.
The court’s intervention at this early stage, before a federal appeals court has ruled on the law, would be highly unusual but not unprecedented.
In its court filing, Texas defended an order by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that allowed the abortion law to go back into effect after a lower-court judge put it on hold.
‘In sum, far from being demonstrably wrong, the Fifth Circuit’s conclusion that Texas is likely to prevail was entirely right,’ the state wrote.”
As Guardian US (with The 19th) has reported: On 31 August, there were 17 abortion providers serving at the four locations of the Whole Woman’s Health clinics in Texas. On 1 September – the day that the nation’s most restrictive active abortion law went into effect – there were just eight.
And this report by our Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Jessica Glenza, which outlined: Former Texas solicitor general Jonathan Mitchell, who played a pivotal role in designing the legal framework of the state’s near-total abortion ban, also argued on behalf of anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life that women would still be able to terminate pregnancies if Roe was overturned by traveling to “wealthy pro-abortion” states like California and New York with the help of “taxpayer subsidies”.
“Women can ‘control their reproductive lives’ without access to abortion; they can do so by refraining from sexual intercourse,” Mitchell wrote in the brief.
1.59pm EDT
13:59
Joe Manchin pumps brakes on imminent spending package framework deal
Joanna Walters
Another dip on the Capitol Hill roller coaster as latest reports have conservative Senator Joe Manchin telling reporters he thinks there won’t be an outline deal agreed on the heart of the Build Back Better legislation by tomorrow – despite growing expectations that that had been in reach.
“This is not going to happen anytime soon,” Manchin told reporters following him around in Washington, DC, noting that “good progress” was being made, as intense negotiations continue, but there is still a lot of detail to be sorted out, Reuters has just reported.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sounded optimistic earlier that there could be a framework deal announced as early as tomorrow. But the Democratic human road block from West Virginia appears once again to be standing in his party’s way.
Congressional Democrats are trying to thrash out the size and nature of the flagship spending package, aiming for it to be passed in the Senate on a simple majority vote via the reconciliation process.
Originally priced at $3.5tn, the moderate nub of Manchin and Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema are instrumental in moves to beat down the top line of wide-ranging investments to expand social programs and attack climate change to less than $2tn at this rate – possibly minus a major element to reduce emissions targets to reduce global heating.
Updated
at 2.12pm EDT
1.24pm EDT
13:24
‘We have to keep up the fight and get it done,’ Biden says of voting rights legislation
Joe Biden condemned Republican efforts to enact voting restrictions, describing such attempts at voter suppression as “un-American”.
The president was speaking one day after Senate Republicans blocked Democrats‘ Freedom to Vote Act from advancing, dealing another blow to Biden’s hopes of enacting national voting rights legislation.
“We have to keep up the fight and get it done,” Biden said in his speech at the Dr Martin Luther King memorial. “I know the stakes. You know the stakes. This is far from over.”
(@CBSNews)
Biden calls voter suppression the most “un-American thing any of us can imagine” and thanks Dr. King Jr.’s son Martin Luther King III for leading marches on voting rights on the anniversary of the 1968 March on Washington. pic.twitter.com/7lD8KIapPz
Biden added that his administration was also working to confront “the deep stain on the soul of the nation: hate and white supremacy”.
The president drew a historical line from America’s shameful enslavement of African people to Ku Klux Klan terrorism to the 2017 neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville and the deadly Capitol insurrection on January 6.
“The through line is that hate never goes away,” Biden said. “It only hides.”
1.11pm EDT
13:11
Joe Biden reflected on Congress’ failure to pass police reform legislation as he spoke at the Dr Martin Luther King memorial in Washington.
The president had hoped to sign the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act by the one-year anniversary of Floyd’s murder at the hands of a white Minneapolis police officer, but that deadline came and went in May.
“I know the frustration we all feel that … meaningful police reform in George’s name has still not passed Congress,” Biden said.
But the president committed to continuing to work to pass the bill, saying, “The fight’s not anywhere near over.”
12.51pm EDT
12:51
Speaking at the Dr Martin Luther King memorial in Washington, Kamala Harris emphasized the need to enact national voting rights legislation, as Republican-led legislatures across the country approve voting restrictions.
The vice-president, who has been named as the Biden administration‘s point person on voting rights, was speaking one day after Senate Republicans blocked Democrats‘ Freedom to Vote Act from advancing.
“We should not have to keep fighting to secure our fundamental rights,” Harris said. “But fight we must. And fight we will.”
12.48pm EDT
12:48
House speaker Nancy Pelosi spoke before Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the dedication of the Dr Martin Luther King memorial in Washington.
The Democratic speaker recounted how she was in the nation’s capital for the March on Washington in 1963 but could not stay for King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech because “I had to leave to go get married.”
Pelosi said it was “such an occasion to see so many people converging on Washington, DC,” including her beloved late colleague John Lewis, the civil rights icon who died last year.
Pelosi quoted King’s words, saying, “Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of America’s children.”
Updated
at 12.48pm EDT