GP leaders say Th?r?se Coffey’s NHS plan will make ‘no tangible difference’ – UK politics live

Read More

Th?r?se Coffey is deputy prime minister as well as health secretary. Speaking on ITV’s Good Morning Britain this morning, and responding to a question from the former Labour MP Ed Balls, who was presenting, she said that as deputy PM whould be would “chairing things like the home affairs committee and different elements like that”. But she rejected claims this meant she would be doing the health job part time. She said:

I’m conscious that in two weeks we’ve already pulled together our plan for patients and we will continue to develop that.

I don’t think it will be a case of being part-time … We don’t have fixed working hours.

Most people will be worse off this year than last year, despite the huge package of support offered by the government to help with the cost of living crisis, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said.

In a briefing before the “emergency budget” tomorrow, the IFS researcher Xiaowei Xu said rising inflation meant people across the income spectrum would see their living standards fall in real terms. She said:

In real terms, we expect the median earner to be ?500 worse off than they were last year, which is around a 3% net cut in their income.

High earners – but not very higher earners – will be more than ?1,000 worse off which would be a larger increase in percentage terms. Lower earners and those out of work will be more shielded from the rising cost of living, both in cash terms and as a share of income.

Even after the government is spending vast amounts of money to protect households from the rising cost of living, most households would still see their living standards fall this year compared to last year.

The SNP’s Stephen Flynn said it was good to see Jacob Rees-Mogg in the Commons, instead of standing by a pile of rubbish. He asked Rees-Mogg to confirm that companies such as Amazon would benefit from the plan announced yesterday, and he said Scotland, which produced more oil and gas “than we can possibly consume”, had been let down by Scotland.

In response, Rees-Mogg said he was reminded of what PG Wodehouse wrote about it being “not difficult to discern the difference between a Scotsman with a grievance and a ray of sunshine”. He did not address the point about Amazon.

The ban on fracking in England has been lifted, after Jacob Rees-Mogg called the current limits on seismic activity “too low” and admitted they were likely to be raised. My colleague Aubrey Allegretti has the story here.

Jonathan Reynolds, the shadow business secretary, tabled the urgent question on the energy package. He said the government had failed to say how much the energy support package would cost. He went on:

This government says it can cut taxes, increase spending, increase borrowing and magically pay for that through higher growth that after 12 years in office has completely eluded them. This is fantasy economics and is a threat to British businesses and the financial stability of this country.

In the Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg, the business secretary, has just started answering an urgent question on the energy support package for non-domestic users he announced yesterday.

Before he began Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, said he was very disappointed that such an important statement was made to the media yesterday, and not in the House of Commons. MPs were in the Commons yesterday to swear oaths of allegiance to the new King. Hoyle said he would have allowed a statement.

Rees-Mogg says he did not think it was possible to have a statement on a day when MPs were swearing oaths of allegiance. That had not happened before, he said, and it did not happen in 1952, the last time there was a change of monarch.

Hoyle interrupted Rees-Mogg to point out that he could have asked. If they had had a conversation, Rees-Mogg would have found a statement was possible, he says.

The i’s Paul Waugh has the clip.

There are two urgent questions in the Commons this morning, before business questions and then the health statement from Th?r?se Coffey.

Here is a summary of the main things Th?r?se Coffey said on health policy on her interview round this morning.

Coffey, the health secretary and deputy prime minister, said the target for patients being able to see a GP within two weeks was “an expectation”, rather than a firm guarantee. Asked on the Today programme whether this was a guarantee or a target or just an ambition, Coffey said it was “an expectation” that she was setting out on behalf of patients. Alastair McLellan, editor of the Health Service Journal, says the government appears to have over-briefed what was actually being announced.

Coffey’s clarification may come as a disappointment to readers of the Daily Express.

Coffey said GPs could meet the two week deadline by offering a telephone consultation. Asked if the pledge meant patients would see a doctor face to face withing two weeks, she told LBC:

That’s open to the relationship between the GP and the patient I’m not going to be overly prescriptive. I know that some people enjoy just having a phone call, but may need to go in and see the doctor, I know that other patients are very keen in that regard.

She said that forcing GPs to publish their appointment times data “may give some patients the opportunity to choose to use a different GP”.

She accepted that the NHS needed more doctors, but said the government had already set out a long-term plan to address this.

She sidestepped questions about whether the government is reviewing its anti-obesity strategy. (As Guardian readers will know, the strategy is being reviewed, on the orders of the Treasury; my colleague Denis Campbell revealed this last week.)

Coffey refused to say whether she thought the sugar tax – introduced to discourage people consuming soft drinks with a high sugar content – was working. There is evidence showing it has been successful, but Liz Truss is sceptical about government interfering with consumer choice, the cost of living crisis has made it harder to defend, and there has been speculation that her administration could axe the sugar tax too. When it was put to Coffey on the Today programme that most of her predecessors supported the measure, she said she had just been in the job for two weeks and was focusing on her plan for patients.

Good morning. The House of Commons will be sitting properly again today and Th?r?se Coffey, the new health secretary and deputy prime minister, will make a statement on plans to improve the NHS. Liz Truss has said that, at the start of her premiership, she wants to focus on three priorities: health, cutting taxes, and energy. During the Tory leadership contest Truss talked a lot about the second two topics, but she said almost nothing about her thinking on health policy. Her campaign sent out almost 50 press releases, but only one of them mentioned the NHS, and only three mentioned health.

Some aspects of the announcement have been briefed overnight, and Coffey will be setting out “her expectation that everyone who needs one should get an appointment at a GP practice within two weeks”. Older readers may remember that around 20 years ago the Labour government has a target for everyone being able to see a GP within two days, not two weeks – although it led to GPs refusing to book appointments more than two days in advance, and was later scrapped by the Tories.

My colleague Denis Campbell has a preview of the announcement here.

So far doctors’ leaders have been unimpressed – primarily because they say Coffey is not addressing the main problem, which is a shortage of staff for the workload they are facing.

Prof Martin Marshall, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said:

Lumbering a struggling service with more expectations, without a plan as to how to deliver them, will only serve to add to the intense workload and workforce pressures GPs and our teams are facing, whilst also having minimal impact on the care patients receive.

And Dr Farah Jameel, chair of the British Medical Association‘s GP committee for England, said in a statement:

The target of GPs now offering appointments within two weeks is simply another addition to a tick-box culture highlighting a tone-deaf government approach when it comes to those delivering the service on the ground.

GPs need to be freed up to deliver the care that we know patients so desperately need – that means we need a genuine strategy to address the workforce crisis. There simply aren’t enough GPs and staff to deliver the care our patients need and deserve.

Today’s GP workforce data shows that between August 2021 and August 2022 we lost the equivalent of 314 full-time GPs. We now have the equivalent of 1,850 fewer fully qualified full time GPs than we did in 2015, with 16% more patients per GP. We are losing more GPs than we can recruit and this combined with cost of living pressures is starting to spell the end of GP practices as we know them …

If the new health secretary had met with us before this announcement we could have suggested a workable strategy to address the unfolding crisis before us for this winter and beyond – instead we have in reality minor tweaks that will make no tangible difference to patients struggling to access care.

Coffey has been giving interviews this morning. I will summarise what she has been saying shortly.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9am: The Institute for Fiscal Studies holds a briefing on what is expected in Kwasi Kwarteng’s “emergency budget” tomorrow.

9.30am: Census data for Northern Ireland, including figures on religious affiliation, is published.

After 10am: Th?r?se Coffey, the new health secretary, makes a statement to MPs about plans to improve patient access to the NHS.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

12pm: The Bank of England announces its decision on changing interest rates.

2.15pm: The CBI, the Resolution Foundation and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation give evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about the cost of living.

I try to monitor the comments below the line (BTL) but it is impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer questions, and if they are of general interest, I will post the question and reply above the line (ATL), although I can’t promise to do this for everyone.

If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.

Alternatively, you can email me at andrew.sparrow@theguardian.com

Related articles

You may also be interested in

Headline

Never Miss A Story

Get our Weekly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.
Cookie policy

We use our own and third party cookies to allow us to understand how the site is used and to support our marketing campaigns.